Configurable Assessment Module - SR-046

The Social Registry must provide the capability to define and execute configurable assessments of registrants' needs and conditions, supporting multiple assessment methodologies.

Enables flexible and adaptable assessment of registrant needs and conditions, which is important for determining potential eligibility for various social protection programs and tailoring services. This capability supports a more nuanced and targeted approach to social protection than simple binary eligibility checks.

• Assessing a household's poverty level based on configurable income and asset thresholds.

• Determining an individual's vulnerability level based on factors like disability status, employment status, and household composition.

• Evaluating a registrant's needs for specific types of assistance (e.g., food, shelter, healthcare).

• Adapting assessment criteria to different programs or geographic regions.

• Assessment Definition:

  • Assessment ID (unique identifier)

  • Assessment Name

  • Assessment Description

  • Assessment Methodology (e.g., PMT, vulnerability index, custom rules)

  • Assessment Rules/Logic (configurable criteria and calculations)

  • Input Data Fields (references to data elements in the SR)

  • Output Data Fields (results of the assessment, e.g., score, category, level)

  • Version Number

  • Effective Date

• Assessment Execution:

  • Registrant ID

  • Assessment ID

  • Input Data Values (values for the input data fields)

  • Output Data Values (results of the assessment)

  • Timestamp of Assessment

  • User/System Executing Assessment (for audit trail)

• Assessment Definition: The system must provide an administrative interface for defining and configuring assessment rules. This interface must allow administrators to:

  • Define input data fields (referencing existing data elements in the SR).

  • Specify assessment logic using a rule-based system (e.g., conditional statements, formulas).

  • Define output data fields (the results of the assessment).

  • Manually trigger the execution of assessments on individual registrants or groups of registrants.

• Assessment Execution: The system must be able to execute the defined assessment rules against registrant data.

• Data Storage: Assessment definitions and results must be stored in a structured format (e.g., relational database).

• Reporting: The system must provide basic data export capabilities (e.g., CSV export) of raw assessment results.

• Assessment Definition: The system should provide a more advanced rule-based configuration engine, supporting user-defined parameters and more complex logic (e.g., loops, functions).

• Invocation: The system should provide a real-time API for external systems to trigger assessments and retrieve results.

• Reporting: The system should integrate with Business Intelligence (BI) tools for data visualization and the creation of reporting dashboards.

• Versioning: The system should implement version control for assessment definitions to manage changes over time.

• Assessment Definition: The system could incorporate AI-enhanced assessment capabilities, such as adaptive logic that adjusts assessment rules based on historical data or machine learning models.

• Invocation: The system could support a federated GraphQL API for real-time assessment execution across distributed systems.

• Reporting: The system could provide immersive dashboards with predictive analytics and augmented reality (AR) visualization.

• Dynamic Updates: The system could trigger automatic re-assessments when underlying data changes.

• Access to assessment definition and execution must be restricted to authorized personnel through role-based access control.

• Assessment data must be handled in accordance with data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR).

• Audit trails of assessment definition changes and execution must be maintained.

• If APIs are provided (Standard and Advanced levels), they must be secured using appropriate authentication and authorization mechanisms (e.g., OAuth 2.0).

• The system should be designed to handle a large number of assessment definitions and executions efficiently.

• Consider using asynchronous processing for long-running assessments.

• At the Standard and Advanced levels, the system should provide APIs for integration with external systems.

• Ideally, the system should support standardized data formats for assessment definitions and results (e.g., JSON Schema).

Compliance with GDPR for assessment data privacy.

• Administrative Interface (Minimum): A user-friendly interface must be provided for administrators to define, configure, and manage assessment rules. This interface should allow for:

  • Creating new assessment definitions.

  • Editing existing assessment definitions.

  • Defining input and output data fields.

  • Specifying assessment logic.

  • Testing assessment rules.

  • Activating/deactivating assessments.

• Reporting Interface (Standard/Advanced): If integrated with BI tools or providing advanced reporting, user interfaces should be provided for:

  • Viewing assessment results.

  • Generating reports on assessment outcomes.

  • Visualizing assessment data.