Work Flows
In order to clearly define the roles, to avoid overlaps, double work and gaps not covered by any organisation, the main processes of the planned organizational set-up need to be defined in detail, assigning activities to each partner. In this section, a few of the main processes are drafted.
In the column “Who” a main responsible is assigned, sometimes a second organisation is added in brackets to support the process.
Release Management (Software Maintenance)
One of the main challenges with release management is to coordinate the development of MS IMIS and open source application.
Who | Activity | |
---|---|---|
1. Continuously | ||
1.1 | Insurance Agencies, Implementation Partners | Report issues, request features |
1.2 | IT & Product Team |
|
1.3 | Steering Group | Annual strategic reviews of features, budgets, timelines |
2. At each release cycle | ||
2.1 | Program Coordination Desk | Consolidation of user requirements, including interfaces, budget and joint timelines. Preparation of proposal for Product Committee |
2.2 | TAG | Receive and process contributions / requirements from partners (JLN, openHIE, clients ...) to the Program Coordination Desk |
2.3 | Product Committee |
|
2.4 | TAG | When necessary, request input on specific topics from relevant experts. Peer review the technical specifications when necessary |
2.5 | IT & Product Team |
|
2.6 | Insurance Agencies, Implementation Partners | User acceptance Testing (including security testing?) |
2.7 | Product Coordination Desk | Final Acceptance (based on test results and feedback from Insurance Agencies and implementation partners) |
2.8 | IT & Product Team |
|
Table 1: Release management workflow
User Support Workflow
The main idea is that there is a centralized ticket system (starting at 3rd tier), where users can submit their issues that cannot be solved at country level.
Who | Activity |
---|---|
End user / technical user | In case an end-user encounters an issue, he/she reports this to 1st tier support. The local/national team should be able to provide basic support for these issues In case national 1st tier support cannot solve the issue, it is passed on to 2nd tier support. |
Implementation Partner | Most of the time, implementation partners have support contracts with a local/national project. Therefore, often they can assume 2nd tier support. |
IT & Product Team | In case the problem cannot be solved at 2nd tier, it should be fed into a central issue queue, and open a ticket at 3rd tier. In this ticket, the submitting 2nd tier support team should describe the issue. |
IT & Product Team (Program Coordination Desk) | In case the issue can be resolved without much effort, it can be closed. In case the issue requires higher effort, priorities need to be discussed with the Program Coordination Desk / TAG / SG (Process 3.1). |
Table 2: User support and issue management workflow
Country Sales and Implementation Workflow
There are several possible constellations, how the sales process can unfold. In general, the proposal process should be based on open competition, spreading implementation know-how to a growing number of international, regional and national implementation partners. The IT & Product Team and GIZ should assume the role of supporting the proposal processes of implementation partners upon request.
Who | Activity |
---|---|
Program Coordination Desk | Inform stakeholders about program news and project opportunities |
TAG | Give feedback on communication and sales strategy, measures and tools |
Program Coordination Desk | Initial contacts and general information
|
Insurance Agency(potential customer) –Program Coordination Desk (SG) |
|
Insurer - Implementation partners |
|
Implementation Partners | Implement software and involve local team |
Table 3: Implementation workflow
Did you encounter a problem or do you have a suggestion?
Please contact our Service Desk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/