Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Decisions to take 

In italic, decisions proposed by bluesquare, still open point are in bold
Strategy (iterative approach)

    • Modularity level
      • by business domain
        • Coarse or fine grained
      • by layer (frontend, back ends)
    • What will be an OpenIMIS module:
      • Unidirectional dependencies
      • Open for extension but close for modifications
      • Loose coupling:  can be plug or unplug at will but it is costly and not easy to learn 
      • Level of customization (data source, logic , parameters, ....)
    • What standards need to be used to retrieve and publish data
      • FHIR (external)
      • Database connectors (module internal)
      • Current API (intra module)
    • What action modules should be able to trigger on other module:
      • Should we have Business process management
      • Should we use only event (dynamic)  or contributions (static)
  • Tools
    • Front ends: GUI
      • Language : Javascript
      • Framework : React
    • Back end: 
      • Language : Python
      • Framework : REST Django + Celery and RabbitMQ
    • Database :
      • PostgreSQL 
      • FHIRbase: PostgreSQL + JSONB
    • Batches :  recurrent jobs to updates records / workflows
      • Language : Python
      • Framework : Django
      • recommended task planner: Airflow
    • Mobile
      • Progressive built in module 
    • Standard for API
      • FHIR
      • JSON API ....
    • What module should be part of Tender 1:
      • Name
      • Boundaries