Goal: “Discover users feedback about the current UI and identify problems and potentials to treat in the new design guideline“
Personas Overview:
The following list provides an overview of all user personas in openIMIS. All information in the personas are 100% made up and generated.
Role | Name | Location | Age | Background | Goals | Challenges |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enrolment Officer | Fatima Mwanga | Tanzania | 32 | Social sciences, 5 years in health | Maximize enrolment, improve community awareness | Tech access in remote areas, language barriers |
Clerk | Ramesh Gurung | Nepal | 28 | Office management diploma, 4 years | Maintain accurate records, streamline processing | Application backlog, changing regulations |
Accountant | Jean-Paul Ngome | Cameroon | 40 | Accounting degree, 10 years experience | Accurate financial records, timely reporting | Data reconciliation, resource limitations |
Receptionist | Aisha Thapa | Nepal | 35 | Healthcare management degree, 6 years | Ensure patient access to claim forms, facilitate claims process | High patient volume, ensuring accurate info |
Claim Administrator | Ramesh Gurung | Nepal | 28 | Office management diploma, 4 years | Timely claims submission, improve provider communication | High volume claims, tracking claims status |
Medical Officer | Dr. Lila Acharya | Nepal | 45 | Medical degree, 15 years experience | Ensure claim accuracy, enhance collaboration | Inconsistent info, tight deadlines |
Scheme Administrator | Pascal Nguene | Cameroon | 38 | Public administration degree, 8 years | Smooth scheme operation, provide accurate data | Cumbersome management, data accuracy |
openIMIS Administrator | Sara Mbuyu | Tanzania | 30 | IT background, 5 years in admin | Ensure data security, maintain system reliability | Disruptive updates, user access control |
Personas Details:
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Persona: Fatima Mwanga
|
Users Feedback Questionaire:
...
We will use SUS over Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX) cause we can get a little more in-depth feedback from users.
Item | Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree | |
---|---|---|
1 | I think that I would like to use this system frequently. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
2 | I found this system to be simple. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
3 | I thought the system was easy to use. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
4 | I think I could use this system without the support of a technical person. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
5 | I found the various functions in this system were well integrated. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
6 | I thought there a lot of consistency in this system. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
7 | I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
8 | I found the system very intuitive. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
9 | I felt very confident using the system. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
10 | I could use the system without having to learn anything new. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
...
To put that score into a intuitive labeling we will use the one from Bangor, Kortum, & Miller (2009):
SUS Score Range | Adjective |
---|---|
85.59 – 100.00 | Best imaginable |
72.76 – 85.58 | Excellent |
52.02 – 72.75 | Good |
39.18 – 52.01 | OK |
25.01 – 39.17 | Poor |
0.00 – 25.00 | Worst imaginable |
Sources: https://testscience.org/measuring-usability/
...