Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Regional hubs: rational behind targeting the regional hubs is to give the people who have access to decision-makers, the tools to talk about openIMIS and what an implementation requires (as targeting the decision-makers directly is unrealistic).

  • AeHIN: most of their members are academics and medical students (medical faculties of universities) but also health insurance agents, who are less familiar with the IT part. An overarching goal is to increase ICT participation in the hubs to make people feel more comfortable with the IT side.

  • ILO: need to increase understanding of IT governance, especially for mid-level business people. Also important that we somehow reach decision-makers.

  • GIZ: we also should keep in mind the overall social protection aspect. However, we need to be stick to what is actually applied right now, which is the health insurance sector. There is still room to include a part on social protection and how it could be applied in other settings within the course (one module for example)

Outcome of discussion with AeHIN 12.02:

Health financing and health informatics were identified as key topics that are needed. We identified three different target groups:

Government

  • without insurance (policymakers responsible for planning for insurance)

  • with insurance but no API

  • with insurance w API (BPJS Indonesia)

Academe

  • MPH health informatics/health financing schools (eg, Univ Gadja Mada, Yogyakarta

  • medical schools + nursing schools (Ateneo, UP, St Lukes, San Beda)

Tech SMEs that can support OpenIMIS

  • FOSS for SMEs