Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

UI seems to be limited to straight Payment registering (with straight matching - aka ‘contribution’ -)

Highlights of the database scheme:

Questions:

  • why “InsuranceNumber” field in PaymentDetail (matching is via Contribution, not insuree…)?

  • in TZ, payment type “F” is related to funding (not contributions)… should we filter in this module (as we do filter the ‘funding’ --aka fake-- family)?

WARNINGS (to be refined):

  • Payment matching (cfr. uspMatchPayment, …)

  • Payment ‘intent’ (cfr. uspInsertPaymentIntent,…)

  • Payment/Contribution ‘REST-API’ (cfr. uspAPIEnterContribution, uspReceivePayment…)

Out of scope

  • outgoing payments

    • payment by capitation (cfr. uspSSRSCapitationPayment)

  • operational reports

    • uspLastDateForPayment (necessary for policy expiry handling ?)

  • Payers (contributions depends on Payers module, but managing payers is outside contribution module scope

  • No labels